by Andrew Fischer
From: massbike@cycling.org
The appropriate statute is Chapter 89 section 11, which reads:
MGLA 89 S 11
S 11. Marked crosswalks; yielding right of way to pedestrians; penalty
When traffic control signals are not in place or not in operation thedriver of a vehicle shall yield the right of way, slowing down or stoppingif need be so to yield, to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a crosswalkmarked in accordance with standards established by the department of highwaysif the pedestrian is on that half of the traveled part of the way on whichthe vehicle is traveling or if the pedestrian approaches from the oppositehalf of the traveled part of the way to within five feet of that half ofthe traveled part of the way on which said vehicle is traveling.
No driver of a vehicle shall pass any other vehicle which has stoppedat a marked crosswalk to permit a pedestrian to cross, nor shall any suchoperator enter a marked crosswalk until there is a sufficient space beyondthe crosswalk to accommodate the vehicle he is operating, notwithstandingthat a traffic control signal may indicate that vehicles may proceed.
Whoever violates any provision of this section shall be punished bya fine of not more than one hundred dollars.
The key words are the first words "When traffic control signalsare not in place or not in operation". In the William Spring accident,there were traffic signals, and William Spring was crossing against thetraffif signal. While bicyclist/courier Gladstone should have stopped IFHE COULD, he did have the right of way and he was not violating the statute.Mr. Spring was crossing against the light.
Is that jaywalking? It depends on how you define "jaywalking".
Andrew M. Fischer
Bicyclist,advocate and attorney
back to BostonCrash Controversy
If you have comments or suggestions, email me at messvilleto@yahoo.com